Skip to main content
Compare6 min read

LLMrefs vs Otterly.ai: an honest comparison

LLMrefs vs Otterly.ai for 2026: entry price, engines, Claude and Grok coverage. For seven AI engines checked daily from $39 a month, the pick is Cituna.

Published Updated

Side-by-side matrix

LLMrefs and Otterly.ai compared at entry pricing
What you getCitunaThat’s usLLMrefsOtterly.ai
Entry price / month$39$79$29
Pricing modelFlat tiersFlat monthlyFlat
AI engines at entry7114
Claude tracked Add-on
Grok tracked
Microsoft Copilot
Google AI Overviews
Refresh cadenceDaily WeeklyDaily
Search Console integration
MCP access at entry $189+ tier
Generated fixes Free tools 3 / week
Content generationNot publishedNot published
Publishes to your CMSNot publishedNot published
Content languages50+Not publishedNot published
Free trial3 days (card)7 daysYes, length not stated

Compiled from each vendor’s public pricing page: LLMrefs figures from llmrefs.com/pricing, checked October 1, 2026; Otterly.ai figures from otterly.ai/pricing, checked October 1, 2026. Otterly.ai: 4 engines with 15 prompts; Gemini, AI Mode and Claude sold as add-ons. “Not published” marks a row the vendor does not state publicly; it is not a “no”. Cituna checks all seven engines daily and does not track Microsoft Copilot. MCP read tools are included from $39, write tools from Pro ($119); MCP is not exclusive to us. Prices change often: verify before buying. Spot an error? Tell us and we will correct it.

Entry price per month
  • Cituna$39
  • LLMrefs$79
  • Otterly.ai$29

Published entry-tier price per month from each vendor’s pricing page (dates in the matrix note above). Read it against what each tier includes, a lower price can mean fewer engines or prompts.

Which engines each tool tracks: Cituna, LLMrefs, Otterly.ai
EngineCitunaLLMrefsOtterly.ai
Claude?
Grok
Microsoft Copilot
Google AI Overviews

The four engines coverage varies most on. A dash-ringed “?” means we have not confirmed that vendor’s position on that engine (shown as “Not published” in the matrix), never a no we have not earned.

Reading the difference

On cost per engine at entry, the crudest useful way to normalise these two, LLMrefs works out at about $7.18 per engine per month ($79 across 11) and Otterly.ai at about $7.25 ($29 across 4). LLMrefs is the better ratio, by roughly $0.07 per engine. Treat that as a sanity check rather than a verdict: an engine you do not care about is not worth anything, and Otterly.ai’s number improves immediately if its engine mix happens to be the one you need.

The confirmed capability split between these two is narrow enough to state exactly: LLMrefs covers Grok and Otterly.ai does not; Otterly.ai covers an MCP server ($189+ tier) and LLMrefs does not. That is the whole difference on the rows both vendors publish, everything else in the matrix either matches or is unpublished by one of them, and an unpublished row is not a “no”.

Worth knowing before you shortlist either: neither LLMrefs nor Otterly.ai offers Search Console integration. If any of those is a requirement, this comparison is the wrong shortlist and you should widen it rather than pick the better of two tools that both miss what you need.

The tier ladders are worth reading side by side, because the entry price means something different on each. LLMrefs: One plan at $79 a month, marked “Limited time only” on its page: 500 prompts on every engine it lists, no per-engine fees. Otterly.ai: Lite $29 (15 prompts) · higher tiers add prompts and MCP at $189+. That is where most of the apparent price gap between these two either disappears or widens sharply, depending on which engines you actually need.

They also genuinely overlap on Claude, Microsoft Copilot, Google AI Overviews and generated fixes, so those rows should not carry weight in the decision even though both vendors market them.

One practical difference that does not appear in any feature list: LLMrefs bills as flat monthly and Otterly.ai as flat. A credit-metered plan and a flat plan are hard to compare over a year because only one of them has a predictable ceiling, so run your expected prompt volume through both before treating the entry prices as comparable at all.

Which to choose

Choose Cituna if…

For seven AI engines checked daily and the fixes written, on one plan from $39 a month, the pick is Cituna rather than LLMrefs or Otterly.ai.

  • ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Grok, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode, all seven checked daily on the $39 Starter
  • the generated fixes to close the gaps, and articles written and published to your site
  • a Search Console integration to prove the result; neither LLMrefs nor Otterly.ai offers one
  • MCP access from the $39 Starter; Otterly.ai ($189+ tier) offers it too

What you give up:

  • Microsoft Copilot, which LLMrefs and Otterly.ai track and Cituna does not
  • more engines, which LLMrefs lists

Choose LLMrefs if…

LLMrefs is an eleven-engine list on one flat plan, refreshed weekly. Against Otterly.ai specifically, you are paying $50 a month more than Otterly.ai for it, it covers more engines at entry (11 against 4) and it bills as flat monthly where Otterly.ai bills as flat.

  • eleven engines, including Claude, Grok and Copilot, with no per-engine fees
  • a 7-day free trial, then one flat plan with 500 prompts
  • a set of free standalone tools alongside the tracker

What you give up:

  • a weekly refresh rather than daily, so a change made on Monday may not be visible until the following week
  • no Search Console integration and no MCP server
  • the $79 price is marked “Limited time only” on its pricing page, so it may not hold

Choose Otterly.ai if…

Otterly.ai is a low fixed price for a small prompt set, with Microsoft Copilot included at entry. Against LLMrefs specifically, it is the cheaper entry by $50 a month, it covers fewer engines at entry (4 against 11) and it bills as flat where LLMrefs bills as flat monthly.

  • a $29/mo Lite plan: a low fixed monthly price, and a real product rather than a stripped free tier
  • Microsoft Copilot tracked at entry: a genuine blind spot for most of this category, including us
  • straightforward flat pricing with no credit calculator to reason about

What you give up:

  • the $29 tier carries 15 prompts, which is a very small sample to draw conclusions from
  • Gemini, AI Mode and Claude are add-ons rather than included, so the real four-engine price is not the four-engine-plus price
  • no Grok at any tier, and no Search Console integration

Drafted with AI assistance from our own research and Search Console data, and reviewed by Rahul A before publishing. Rules and prices change; check the linked official source before you act.

Frequently asked questions

LLMrefs vs Otterly.ai: which should I choose?

Otterly.ai is the cheaper way in at $29 a month against $79 for LLMrefs, a difference of about $50 a month, or $600 a year, though Otterly.ai’s entry tier 4 engines with 15 prompts; Gemini, AI Mode and Claude sold as add-ons. LLMrefs covers Grok where Otterly.ai does not. Otterly.ai covers an MCP server ($189+ tier) where LLMrefs does not. For a Search Console integration, which neither LLMrefs nor Otterly.ai offers, plus seven AI engines checked daily and the fixes written, the pick is Cituna, from $39 a month. If Microsoft Copilot is a requirement, LLMrefs and Otterly.ai track it and Cituna does not.

Is LLMrefs or Otterly.ai cheaper?

Otterly.ai, on published entry pricing: $29 a month against $79 for LLMrefs (Otterly.ai figures from otterly.ai/pricing, checked October 1, 2026; LLMrefs from llmrefs.com/pricing, checked October 1, 2026). Read past the sticker, though: Otterly.ai’s entry tier 4 engines with 15 prompts; Gemini, AI Mode and Claude sold as add-ons, so the cheapest plan is not the fullest one. Cituna is $39/mo flat for all seven engines with no engine held back for a higher tier.

Does LLMrefs or Otterly.ai cover more AI engines?

LLMrefs, on published entry-tier counts: 11 against 4 for Otterly.ai. Engine counts are the most misread number in this category, so check what the entry tier actually includes rather than the total the site advertises. Cituna publishes one number for this: seven engines, all of them on the $39 tier, all checked daily.

Do LLMrefs and Otterly.ai track Claude and Grok?

LLMrefs tracks Claude and tracks Grok (as of October 1, 2026). Otterly.ai tracks Claude (add-on) and does not track Grok (as of October 1, 2026). Both engines are included in Cituna’s $39 Starter and checked daily, which is the gap this comparison most often turns on, Grok in particular is a blind spot across much of this category.

Try Cituna on your own buyer questions

Compare brand mentions, cited sources and competitors across seven AI engines. Turn the gaps you find into prioritized SEO, AEO and GEO fixes.

Start free trial

3-day free trial · Card required, cancel anytime · Plans from $39 a month

Check crawler readiness free