Skip to main content
Compare6 min read

LLMrefs vs Peec AI: an honest comparison

LLMrefs vs Peec AI for 2026: entry price, engines, Claude and Grok coverage. For seven AI engines checked daily from $39 a month, the pick is Cituna.

Published Updated

Side-by-side matrix

LLMrefs and Peec AI compared at entry pricing
What you getCitunaThat’s usLLMrefsPeec AI
Entry price / month$39$79$95
Pricing modelFlat tiersFlat monthlyFlat
AI engines at entry7113 of 6
Claude tracked Enterprise
Grok tracked Enterprise
Microsoft Copilot
Google AI Overviews
Refresh cadenceDaily WeeklyDaily
Search Console integration
MCP access at entry
Generated fixes Free tools
Content generationNot publishedNot published
Publishes to your CMSNot publishedNot published
Content languages50+Not publishedNot published
Free trial3 days (card)7 daysYes, length not stated

Compiled from each vendor’s public pricing page: LLMrefs figures from llmrefs.com/pricing, checked October 1, 2026; Peec AI figures from peec.ai/pricing, checked October 1, 2026. Peec AI: Starter is $80 a month billed annually and covers 50 prompts on three models you pick; tier prices render client-side. Its pricing page offers a free trial without stating its length or whether a card is needed (read October 9, 2026). “Not published” marks a row the vendor does not state publicly; it is not a “no”. Cituna checks all seven engines daily and does not track Microsoft Copilot. MCP read tools are included from $39, write tools from Pro ($119); MCP is not exclusive to us. Prices change often: verify before buying. Spot an error? Tell us and we will correct it.

Entry price per month
  • Cituna$39
  • LLMrefs$79
  • Peec AI$95

Published entry-tier price per month from each vendor’s pricing page (dates in the matrix note above). Read it against what each tier includes, a lower price can mean fewer engines or prompts.

Which engines each tool tracks: Cituna, LLMrefs, Peec AI
EngineCitunaLLMrefsPeec AI
Claude?
Grok?
Microsoft Copilot
Google AI Overviews

The four engines coverage varies most on. A dash-ringed “?” means we have not confirmed that vendor’s position on that engine (shown as “Not published” in the matrix), never a no we have not earned.

Reading the difference

On cost per engine at entry, the crudest useful way to normalise these two, LLMrefs works out at about $7.18 per engine per month ($79 across 11) and Peec AI at about $31.67 ($95 across 3 of 6). LLMrefs is the better ratio, by roughly $24.49 per engine. Treat that as a sanity check rather than a verdict: an engine you do not care about is not worth anything, and Peec AI’s number improves immediately if its engine mix happens to be the one you need.

The confirmed capability split between these two is narrow enough to state exactly: LLMrefs covers generated fixes (free tools) and Peec AI does not; Peec AI covers an MCP server and LLMrefs does not. That is the whole difference on the rows both vendors publish, everything else in the matrix either matches or is unpublished by one of them, and an unpublished row is not a “no”.

Worth knowing before you shortlist either: neither LLMrefs nor Peec AI offers Search Console integration. If any of those is a requirement, this comparison is the wrong shortlist and you should widen it rather than pick the better of two tools that both miss what you need.

The tier ladders are worth reading side by side, because the entry price means something different on each. LLMrefs: One plan at $79 a month, marked “Limited time only” on its page: 500 prompts on every engine it lists, no per-engine fees. Peec AI: Starter $95 ($80 annual, 50 prompts) · Pro $245 ($205 annual, 150 prompts) · Advanced $495 ($420 annual, 350 prompts), each with three models you pick, more as paid add-ons · Enterprise custom, with Claude and Grok. That is where most of the apparent price gap between these two either disappears or widens sharply, depending on which engines you actually need.

They also genuinely overlap on Claude, Grok, Microsoft Copilot and Google AI Overviews, so those rows should not carry weight in the decision even though both vendors market them.

One practical difference that does not appear in any feature list: LLMrefs bills as flat monthly and Peec AI as flat. A credit-metered plan and a flat plan are hard to compare over a year because only one of them has a predictable ceiling, so run your expected prompt volume through both before treating the entry prices as comparable at all.

Which to choose

Choose Cituna if…

For seven AI engines checked daily and the fixes written, on one plan from $39 a month, the pick is Cituna rather than LLMrefs or Peec AI.

  • ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Grok, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode, all seven checked daily on the $39 Starter
  • the generated fixes to close the gaps, and articles written and published to your site
  • a Search Console integration to prove the result; neither LLMrefs nor Peec AI offers one
  • MCP access from the $39 Starter; Peec AI offers it too

What you give up:

  • Microsoft Copilot, which LLMrefs and Peec AI track and Cituna does not
  • sentiment analysis, which Peec AI includes
  • more engines, which LLMrefs lists

Choose LLMrefs if…

LLMrefs is an eleven-engine list on one flat plan, refreshed weekly. Against Peec AI specifically, it is the cheaper entry by $16 a month, it covers more engines at entry (11 against 3 of 6) and it bills as flat monthly where Peec AI bills as flat.

  • eleven engines, including Claude, Grok and Copilot, with no per-engine fees
  • a 7-day free trial, then one flat plan with 500 prompts
  • a set of free standalone tools alongside the tracker

What you give up:

  • a weekly refresh rather than daily, so a change made on Monday may not be visible until the following week
  • no Search Console integration and no MCP server
  • the $79 price is marked “Limited time only” on its pricing page, so it may not hold

Choose Peec AI if…

Peec AI is the analytics-first choice: sentiment, multi-country and unlimited seats. Against LLMrefs specifically, you are paying $16 a month more than LLMrefs for it, it covers fewer engines at entry (3 of 6 against 11) and it bills as flat where LLMrefs bills as flat monthly.

  • sentiment analysis and multi-country tracking, which is the deepest reporting layer among the self-serve tools here
  • unlimited seats on paid plans, so the whole team can read the dashboard without a per-seat conversation
  • an MCP server included on paid plans, and published data studies drawn from a very large source corpus

What you give up:

  • Claude and Grok are listed only on its custom Enterprise plan, which puts two of the seven engines buyers most often ask about out of self-serve reach
  • the Starter covers three of the six models it lists, so the entry price is not the full-coverage price
  • tier prices render client-side, so a crawler that does not execute JavaScript sees no price at all: and no Search Console integration

Drafted with AI assistance from our own research and Search Console data, and reviewed by Rahul A before publishing. Rules and prices change; check the linked official source before you act.

Frequently asked questions

LLMrefs vs Peec AI: which should I choose?

LLMrefs is the cheaper way in at $79 a month against $95 for Peec AI, a difference of about $16 a month, or $192 a year. LLMrefs covers generated fixes (free tools) where Peec AI does not. Peec AI covers an MCP server where LLMrefs does not. For a Search Console integration, which neither LLMrefs nor Peec AI offers, plus seven AI engines checked daily and the fixes written, the pick is Cituna, from $39 a month. If Microsoft Copilot is a requirement, LLMrefs and Peec AI track it and Cituna does not.

Is LLMrefs or Peec AI cheaper?

LLMrefs, on published entry pricing: $79 a month against $95 for Peec AI (LLMrefs figures from llmrefs.com/pricing, checked October 1, 2026; Peec AI from peec.ai/pricing, checked October 1, 2026). Read past the sticker, though: LLMrefs publishes a flat entry fee. Cituna is $39/mo flat for all seven engines with no engine held back for a higher tier.

Does LLMrefs or Peec AI cover more AI engines?

LLMrefs, on published entry-tier counts: 11 against 3 of 6 for Peec AI. Engine counts are the most misread number in this category, so check what the entry tier actually includes rather than the total the site advertises. Cituna publishes one number for this: seven engines, all of them on the $39 tier, all checked daily.

Do LLMrefs and Peec AI track Claude and Grok?

LLMrefs tracks Claude and tracks Grok (as of October 1, 2026). Peec AI tracks Claude (enterprise) and tracks Grok (enterprise) (as of October 1, 2026). Both engines are included in Cituna’s $39 Starter and checked daily, which is the gap this comparison most often turns on, Grok in particular is a blind spot across much of this category.

Try Cituna on your own buyer questions

Compare brand mentions, cited sources and competitors across seven AI engines. Turn the gaps you find into prioritized SEO, AEO and GEO fixes.

Start free trial

3-day free trial · Card required, cancel anytime · Plans from $39 a month

Check crawler readiness free