Claude Rank Tracker

Can you track your rankings in Claude? Yes. Because Claude does not publish a ranked list, a Claude rank tracker works by asking Claude your real buyer questions on a schedule and recording the answer: whether it recommends your brand, in what order, and which competitors it names in your place.

How Claude tracking works

Every day, Cituna sends your buyer prompts, the questions your customers actually type, like “best analytics tool for B2B SaaS” or “which CRM should a small agency use”, to Claude and reads the reply the way a buyer would. For each prompt it records three things: whether Claude recommends your brand at all, your position among the brands it lists, and the full set of competitors Claude names.

Claude answers from two sources: the knowledge baked into its training and, when a question calls for it, live web search. That matters for tracking, because your presence can move when Anthropic ships a new model and again when fresh pages get indexed. A once-a-quarter spot check misses both. Daily checks catch the shifts while they are still small enough to act on, and let you tell a real change from the ordinary run-to-run variation every language model has.

What you see

Results land in a citation matrix: one row per prompt, one column per engine. The Claude column answers, at a glance, the only question that matters, were you cited, yes or no, for every prompt you track. Where Claude does name you, the matrix shows your position in its list; where it doesn’t, it shows the competitor brands Claude recommended instead, so a gap always comes with the names you are losing to.

We track our own domain the same way. In our July 2026 self-scan of cituna.com, Claude cited us in 0 of the 10 buyer prompts we tracked, a gap we can see precisely because we measure it, and exactly the kind of blind spot the tool exists to surface. Every cell refreshes on a daily cadence, so you watch the row change as you ship fixes rather than guessing. And when the matrix shows a gap, Cituna generates the fix, schema, FAQ markup, an llms.txt file and content recommendations, so the next scan has something to move.

Why track Claude

Claude is the fastest-growing assistant among professional and developer audiences, precisely the buyers many B2B products are built for. Yet almost no visibility tool tracks it at entry price: most sell Claude as a paid add-on or reserve it for an enterprise tier, so the engine your technical buyers lean on is the one you are least likely to be watching.

That is the gap this page is about. If your customers ask Claude which tool to buy, you want to know what it says before your competitors do, and you want to know it on the plan you can actually afford. Tracking the other engines too? See the Grok rank tracker and the ChatGPT rank tracker, or the full rundown of AI visibility tools.

Which tools track Claude at entry price

Coverage is where the pricing pages get quiet. Here is which tools include Claude in the plan you would actually buy, at their published entry pricing as of July 16, 2026.

What is rare here isn’t tracking Claude, two tools do, it is tracking it in a $39 base plan, daily, paired with a native Search Console integration so you can tie the work back to real clicks. When you need more, Max ($299) lifts the prompts, brands and allowances, with a custom Enterprise plan, bespoke prompt pools, brands and cadences, beyond it. The two other tools that cover Claude sit higher up: AthenaHQ includes it from its $295/mo Starter and is a capable mid-market platform (AthenaHQ pricing), and Profound tracks Claude on its custom Enterprise plan, though its published $99 Starter covers ChatGPT alone (Profound pricing). Otterly has the lowest sticker at $29 and offers Claude as a paid add-on (Otterly pricing); Peec, built around AI-search analytics for marketing teams, starts near €89 and doesn’t list Claude (Peec pricing).