Skip to main content
Compare6 min read

LLMrefs vs Profound: an honest comparison

LLMrefs vs Profound for 2026: entry price, engines, Claude and Grok coverage. For seven AI engines checked daily from $39 a month, the pick is Cituna.

Published Updated

Side-by-side matrix

LLMrefs and Profound compared at entry pricing
What you getCitunaThat’s usLLMrefsProfound
Entry price / month$39$79Enterprise, unpublished
Pricing modelFlat tiersFlat monthlyCustom contract
AI engines at entry7113 on the trial
Claude tracked Enterprise
Grok tracked
Microsoft Copilot Enterprise
Google AI Overviews
Refresh cadenceDaily Weekly Daily on Enterprise
Search Console integration
MCP access at entry
Generated fixes Free tools Enterprise
Content generationNot publishedNot published
Publishes to your CMSNot publishedNot published
Content languages50+Not publishedNot published
Free trial3 days (card)7 days7 days, 3 engines

Compiled from each vendor’s public pricing page: LLMrefs figures from llmrefs.com/pricing, checked October 1, 2026; Profound figures from www.tryprofound.com/pricing, checked September 25, 2026. Profound: a free 7-day trial on three engines, then a custom Enterprise contract. “Not published” marks a row the vendor does not state publicly; it is not a “no”. Cituna checks all seven engines daily and does not track Microsoft Copilot. MCP read tools are included from $39, write tools from Pro ($119); MCP is not exclusive to us. Prices change often: verify before buying. Spot an error? Tell us and we will correct it.

Entry price per month
  • Cituna$39
  • LLMrefs$79
  • ProfoundNot published

Published entry-tier price per month from each vendor’s pricing page (dates in the matrix note above). Read it against what each tier includes, a lower price can mean fewer engines or prompts.

Which engines each tool tracks: Cituna, LLMrefs, Profound
EngineCitunaLLMrefsProfound
Claude?
Grok
Microsoft Copilot?
Google AI Overviews

The four engines coverage varies most on. A dash-ringed “?” means we have not confirmed that vendor’s position on that engine (shown as “Not published” in the matrix), never a no we have not earned.

Reading the difference

The confirmed capability split between these two is narrow enough to state exactly: LLMrefs covers Grok and Profound does not. That is the whole difference on the rows both vendors publish, everything else in the matrix either matches or is unpublished by one of them, and an unpublished row is not a “no”.

Worth knowing before you shortlist either: neither LLMrefs nor Profound offers Search Console integration and an MCP server. If any of those is a requirement, this comparison is the wrong shortlist and you should widen it rather than pick the better of two tools that both miss what you need.

The tier ladders are worth reading side by side, because the entry price means something different on each. LLMrefs: One plan at $79 a month, marked “Limited time only” on its page: 500 prompts on every engine it lists, no per-engine fees. Profound: Free 7-day trial (3 engines, 50 prompts a day) · Enterprise, price not published (up to 9 engines). Read each ladder against the engines you actually need, since one side names no price to compare.

They also genuinely overlap on Claude, Microsoft Copilot, Google AI Overviews and generated fixes, so those rows should not carry weight in the decision even though both vendors market them.

One practical difference that does not appear in any feature list: Profound sells a custom contract with no published price, while LLMrefs puts its price on its pricing page. Ask Profound for a quote on your prompt volume before treating the two as comparable on cost.

Which to choose

Choose Cituna if…

For seven AI engines checked daily and the fixes written, on one plan from $39 a month, the pick is Cituna rather than LLMrefs or Profound.

  • ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Grok, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode, all seven checked daily on the $39 Starter
  • the generated fixes to close the gaps, and articles written and published to your site
  • a Search Console integration to prove the result; neither LLMrefs nor Profound offers one
  • MCP access from the $39 Starter; neither LLMrefs nor Profound offers it

What you give up:

  • Microsoft Copilot, which LLMrefs and Profound (enterprise) track and Cituna does not
  • SSO and SOC 2 for a security review, plus demand-level prompt-volume data, which Profound offers
  • more engines, which LLMrefs lists

Choose LLMrefs if…

LLMrefs is an eleven-engine list on one flat plan, refreshed weekly. Against Profound specifically, it publishes its price ($79 a month at entry) where Profound does not and it covers more engines at entry (11 against 3 on the trial).

  • eleven engines, including Claude, Grok and Copilot, with no per-engine fees
  • a 7-day free trial, then one flat plan with 500 prompts
  • a set of free standalone tools alongside the tracker

What you give up:

  • a weekly refresh rather than daily, so a change made on Monday may not be visible until the following week
  • no Search Console integration and no MCP server
  • the $79 price is marked “Limited time only” on its pricing page, so it may not hold

Choose Profound if…

Profound is the enterprise option, sold on a custom contract. Against LLMrefs specifically, it publishes no price (the cost is set by contract) and it covers fewer engines at entry (3 on the trial against 11).

  • enterprise depth: demand-level prompt-volume data, agent analytics and conversation-level data
  • an Enterprise contract with all-time history, CSV and JSON exports, an API, unlimited seats, SSO and SOC 2, the items a security review asks for
  • a free 7-day trial, 50 prompts a day on ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Overviews, to see your exposure before a sales conversation

What you give up:

  • no self-serve plan for brands: past the free trial, every plan is a custom Enterprise contract with no published price
  • the trial runs a prompt set Profound recommends for your industry, which you cannot edit, and keeps no history, exports or API
  • Grok is not on its engine list, and there is no Search Console integration, so AI-visibility movement is never tied back to real search clicks inside the product

Drafted with AI assistance from our own research and Search Console data, and reviewed by Rahul A before publishing. Rules and prices change; check the linked official source before you act.

Frequently asked questions

LLMrefs vs Profound: which should I choose?

Profound publishes no price for its paid plan: a free 7-day trial on three engines, then a custom Enterprise contract. LLMrefs starts at $79 a month, so the cost comparison starts with a quote from Profound. LLMrefs covers Grok where Profound does not. For a Search Console integration and an MCP server, which neither LLMrefs nor Profound offers, plus seven AI engines checked daily and the fixes written, the pick is Cituna, from $39 a month. If Microsoft Copilot is a requirement, LLMrefs and Profound (enterprise) track it and Cituna does not. If you need SSO and SOC 2 for a security review, plus demand-level prompt-volume data, Profound offers them.

Is LLMrefs or Profound cheaper?

LLMrefs publishes its price: $79 a month at entry (llmrefs.com/pricing, checked October 1, 2026). Profound publishes none: a free 7-day trial on three engines, then a custom Enterprise contract (www.tryprofound.com/pricing, checked September 25, 2026). Comparing the two on cost starts with a quote from Profound. Cituna is $39/mo flat for all seven engines with no engine held back for a higher tier.

Does LLMrefs or Profound cover more AI engines?

LLMrefs, on published entry-tier counts: 11 against 3 on the trial for Profound. Engine counts are the most misread number in this category, so check what the entry tier actually includes rather than the total the site advertises. Cituna publishes one number for this: seven engines, all of them on the $39 tier, all checked daily.

Do LLMrefs and Profound track Claude and Grok?

LLMrefs tracks Claude and tracks Grok (as of October 1, 2026). Profound tracks Claude (enterprise) and does not track Grok (as of September 25, 2026). Both engines are included in Cituna’s $39 Starter and checked daily, which is the gap this comparison most often turns on, Grok in particular is a blind spot across much of this category.

Try Cituna on your own buyer questions

Compare brand mentions, cited sources and competitors across seven AI engines. Turn the gaps you find into prioritized SEO, AEO and GEO fixes.

Start free trial

3-day free trial · Card required, cancel anytime · Plans from $39 a month

Check crawler readiness free