Skip to main content
Cituna
Compare

Cituna vs Omnia: an honest comparison

Cituna vs Omnia compared for 2026: entry price, AI engines, Claude and Grok coverage, Search Console and MCP, every figure dated and linked to the vendor.

By Rahul AUpdated September 4, 20266 min read

See which of these you are already failing.

On this page
  1. The short verdict
  2. Side-by-side matrix
  3. Reading the difference
  4. Which to choose
  5. FAQ

Side-by-side matrix

Cituna and Omnia compared at entry pricing
What you getCitunaThat’s usOmnia
Entry price / month$39€79
Pricing modelFlat tiersFlat
AI engines at entry67
Claude tracked
Grok tracked
Microsoft Copilot
Google AI OverviewsNot published
Refresh cadenceDailyNot published
Search Console integration
MCP access at entry
Generated fixes Weekly plans
Free trial3 days (card)14 days

Compiled from each vendor’s public pricing page: Omnia figures from useomnia.com/pricing, checked July 16, 2026. Omnia: priced in euros. “Not published” marks a row the vendor does not state publicly; it is not a “no”. Cituna checks all six engines daily and does not track Microsoft Copilot. MCP read tools are included from $39, write tools from Pro ($119); MCP is not exclusive to us. Prices change often: verify before buying. Spot an error? Tell us and we will correct it.

Reading the difference

On cost per engine at entry, the crudest useful way to normalise these two, Cituna works out at about $6.50 per engine per month ($39 across 6) and Omnia at about $12.14 (€79 across 7). Cituna is the better ratio, by roughly $5.64 per engine. Treat that as a sanity check rather than a verdict: an engine you do not care about is not worth anything, and Omnia’s number improves immediately if its engine mix happens to be the one you need.

The confirmed capability split between these two is narrow enough to state exactly: Cituna covers Grok and Search Console integration and Omnia does not; Omnia covers Microsoft Copilot and sentiment analysis (€279 tier) and Cituna does not. That is the whole difference on the rows both vendors publish, everything else in the matrix either matches or is unpublished by one of them, and an unpublished row is not a “no”.

The tier ladders are worth reading side by side, because the entry price means something different on each. Cituna: Starter $39 · Pro $119 · Max $399. Omnia: €79 entry · sentiment on the €279 tier. That is where most of the apparent price gap between these two either disappears or widens sharply, depending on which engines you actually need.

They also genuinely overlap on Claude, an MCP server and generated fixes, so those rows should not carry weight in the decision even though both vendors market them.

One practical difference that does not appear in any feature list: Cituna bills as flat tiers and Omnia as flat. A credit-metered plan and a flat plan are hard to compare over a year because only one of them has a predictable ceiling, so run your expected prompt volume through both before treating the entry prices as comparable at all.

Which to choose

Choose Cituna if…

Cituna is the fix loop: find the gap, generate the fix, prove it in Search Console. Against Omnia specifically, it is the cheaper entry by $46 a month, it covers fewer engines at entry (6 against 7) and and it bills as flat tiers where Omnia bills as flat.

  • all six engines, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Grok and Google AI Overviews, checked daily on the $39 entry tier, with no engine held back for a higher plan
  • generated fixes rather than a chart: schema, FAQ markup, llms.txt and content changes produced from the exact prompts where you are missing
  • a native Google Search Console integration, so an AI-visibility change can be tied back to real clicks instead of stopping at a score

What you give up:

  • no Microsoft Copilot tracking: if Copilot is a reporting requirement, this is a genuine gap and several tools here cover it
  • no sentiment analysis or multi-country breakdowns; the product optimises for the fix, not for the dashboard
  • the trial is 3 days and asks for a card up front: you are not charged during it and can cancel anytime, but it is not a no-card start

Choose Omnia if…

Omnia is the European option, euro-priced with weekly action plans. Against Cituna specifically, you are paying $46 a month more than Cituna for it, it covers more engines at entry (7 against 6) and and it bills as flat where Cituna bills as flat tiers.

  • euro-native pricing and billing, which removes an FX conversion for European teams
  • an MCP server included, plus weekly action plans rather than a bare dashboard
  • a 14-day trial, among the most generous here

What you give up:

  • no Grok coverage at any tier
  • sentiment analysis sits on the €279 tier rather than the €79 entry
  • no Search Console integration

Drafted with AI assistance from our own research and Search Console data, and reviewed by Rahul A before publishing. Rules and prices change; check the linked official source before you act.

Frequently asked questions

Cituna vs Omnia: which should I choose?

Cituna is the cheaper way in at $39 a month against €79 for Omnia, a difference of about $46 a month, or $552 a year. Cituna covers Grok and Search Console integration where Omnia does not. Omnia covers Microsoft Copilot and sentiment analysis (€279 tier) where Cituna does not. If you want all six major engines, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Grok and Google AI Overviews, checked daily, the generated fixes to close the gaps and a Search Console integration to prove the result, Cituna covers that from $39/mo. Cituna does not track Microsoft Copilot; if that is a requirement, weigh the tools here that do.

Is Cituna or Omnia cheaper?

Cituna, on published entry pricing: $39 a month against €79 for Omnia (Cituna figures from cituna.com/pricing, checked August 27, 2026; Omnia from useomnia.com/pricing, checked July 16, 2026). Read past the sticker, though: Cituna publishes a flat entry fee. Cituna is $39/mo flat for all six engines with no engine held back for a higher tier.

Does Cituna or Omnia cover more AI engines?

Omnia, on published entry-tier counts: 7 against 6 for Cituna. Engine counts are the most misread number in this category, so check what the entry tier actually includes rather than the total the site advertises, Omnia’s entry tier priced in euros. Cituna publishes one number for this: six engines, all of them on the $39 tier, all checked daily.

Do Cituna and Omnia track Claude and Grok?

Cituna tracks Claude and tracks Grok (as of August 27, 2026). Omnia tracks Claude and does not track Grok (as of July 16, 2026). Both engines are included in Cituna’s $39 Starter and checked daily, which is the gap this comparison most often turns on, Grok in particular is a blind spot across much of this category.

See how AI engines see your brand

Start a free 3-day trial and see the exact buyer prompts you lose across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Grok and Google AI Overviews, with a prioritized AEO, GEO and SEO action plan and the fixes to win them.

3-day free trial · Card required, cancel anytime · Works with ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Grok and Google AI Overviews

Start free trial