Skip to main content
Compare6 min read

AthenaHQ vs Omnia: an honest comparison

AthenaHQ vs Omnia for 2026: entry price, engines, Claude and Grok coverage. For seven AI engines checked daily from $39 a month, the pick is Cituna.

Published Updated

Side-by-side matrix

AthenaHQ and Omnia compared at entry pricing
What you getCitunaThat’s usAthenaHQOmnia
Entry price / month$39$0 → $295€79
Pricing modelFlat tiersCredit-basedFlat
AI engines at entry75 free / 11 paid7
Claude tracked Paid ($295) On request
Grok tracked Paid ($295)
Microsoft Copilot On request
Google AI Overviews
Refresh cadenceDailyNot publishedDaily
Search Console integration
MCP access at entry
Generated fixes Paid agent Weekly plans
Content generationNot publishedNot published
Publishes to your CMSNot publishedNot published
Content languages50+Not publishedNot published
Free trial3 days (card) Free tier14 days

Compiled from each vendor’s public pricing page: AthenaHQ figures from www.athenahq.ai/plans, checked October 1, 2026; Omnia figures from useomnia.com/pricing, checked October 1, 2026. AthenaHQ: free Essential tier stepping up to a $295/mo Starter. Omnia: priced in euros. “Not published” marks a row the vendor does not state publicly; it is not a “no”. Cituna checks all seven engines daily and does not track Microsoft Copilot. MCP read tools are included from $39, write tools from Pro ($119); MCP is not exclusive to us. Prices change often: verify before buying. Spot an error? Tell us and we will correct it.

Entry price per month
  • Cituna$39
  • AthenaHQ$0 → $295
  • Omnia€79

Published entry-tier price per month from each vendor’s pricing page (dates in the matrix note above). Read it against what each tier includes, a lower price can mean fewer engines or prompts.

Which engines each tool tracks: Cituna, AthenaHQ, Omnia
EngineCitunaAthenaHQOmnia
Claude??
Grok?
Microsoft Copilot?
Google AI Overviews

The four engines coverage varies most on. A dash-ringed “?” means we have not confirmed that vendor’s position on that engine (shown as “Not published” in the matrix), never a no we have not earned.

Reading the difference

On cost per engine at entry, the crudest useful way to normalise these two, AthenaHQ works out at about $26.82 per engine per month ($0 → $295 across 5 free / 11 paid) and Omnia at about $12.14 (€79 across 7). Omnia is the better ratio, by roughly $14.68 per engine. Treat that as a sanity check rather than a verdict: an engine you do not care about is not worth anything, and AthenaHQ’s number improves immediately if its engine mix happens to be the one you need.

The confirmed capability split between these two is narrow enough to state exactly: AthenaHQ covers Grok (paid ($295)) and Search Console integration and Omnia does not; Omnia covers an MCP server and AthenaHQ does not. That is the whole difference on the rows both vendors publish, everything else in the matrix either matches or is unpublished by one of them, and an unpublished row is not a “no”.

The tier ladders are worth reading side by side, because the entry price means something different on each. AthenaHQ: Essential $0 (5 engines) · Starter $295 (11 engines, 3,600 credits). Omnia: €79 Growth (25 prompts) · €279 Pro (100 prompts, data exports) · Enterprise from €499. That is where most of the apparent price gap between these two either disappears or widens sharply, depending on which engines you actually need.

They also genuinely overlap on Claude, Microsoft Copilot, Google AI Overviews and generated fixes, so those rows should not carry weight in the decision even though both vendors market them.

One practical difference that does not appear in any feature list: AthenaHQ bills as credit-based and Omnia as flat. A credit-metered plan and a flat plan are hard to compare over a year because only one of them has a predictable ceiling, so run your expected prompt volume through both before treating the entry prices as comparable at all.

Which to choose

Choose Cituna if…

For seven AI engines checked daily and the fixes written, on one plan from $39 a month, the pick is Cituna rather than AthenaHQ or Omnia.

  • ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Grok, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode, all seven checked daily on the $39 Starter
  • the generated fixes to close the gaps, and articles written and published to your site
  • a Search Console integration to prove the result; AthenaHQ has one too
  • MCP access from the $39 Starter; Omnia offers it too

What you give up:

  • Microsoft Copilot, which AthenaHQ and Omnia (on request) track and Cituna does not
  • sentiment analysis, which Omnia includes
  • more engines, which AthenaHQ lists

Choose AthenaHQ if…

AthenaHQ is an eleven-engine platform, if you can clear the $295 step. Against Omnia specifically, you are paying $210 a month more than Omnia for it, it covers more engines at entry (5 free / 11 paid against 7) and it bills as credit-based where Omnia bills as flat.

  • eleven engines on the $295 Starter, including Claude, Grok, Google AI Mode and Microsoft Copilot
  • a genuinely free Essential tier covering five engines, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and Microsoft Copilot, with no card, which is the least risky way to start in this whole category
  • a native Search Console integration, still uncommon among the self-serve tools

What you give up:

  • the jump from free to paid is a $295 cliff with nothing in between, which prices out most small teams the free tier attracts
  • billing is credit-metered rather than flat, so the monthly cost moves with usage and needs a calculator to predict
  • no MCP server at entry, so the data cannot be queried from an AI client without export

Choose Omnia if…

Omnia is the European option, euro-priced with weekly action plans. Against AthenaHQ specifically, it is the cheaper entry by $210 a month, it covers fewer engines at entry (7 against 5 free / 11 paid) and it bills as flat where AthenaHQ bills as credit-based.

  • euro-native pricing and billing, which removes an FX conversion for European teams
  • an MCP server included, plus weekly action plans rather than a bare dashboard
  • a 14-day trial, among the most generous here

What you give up:

  • no Grok coverage at any tier
  • data exports start on the €279 Pro tier rather than the €79 entry
  • no Search Console integration

Drafted with AI assistance from our own research and Search Console data, and reviewed by Rahul A before publishing. Rules and prices change; check the linked official source before you act.

Frequently asked questions

AthenaHQ vs Omnia: which should I choose?

Omnia is the cheaper way in at €79 a month against $0 → $295 for AthenaHQ, a difference of about $210 a month, or $2520 a year, though Omnia’s entry tier priced in euros. AthenaHQ covers Grok (paid ($295)) and Search Console integration where Omnia does not. Omnia covers an MCP server where AthenaHQ does not. For AthenaHQ’s Search Console integration and Omnia’s MCP server in one plan, plus seven AI engines checked daily and the fixes written, the pick is Cituna, from $39 a month. If Microsoft Copilot is a requirement, AthenaHQ and Omnia (on request) track it and Cituna does not.

Is AthenaHQ or Omnia cheaper?

Omnia, on published entry pricing: €79 a month against $0 → $295 for AthenaHQ (Omnia figures from useomnia.com/pricing, checked October 1, 2026; AthenaHQ from www.athenahq.ai/plans, checked October 1, 2026). Read past the sticker, though: Omnia’s entry tier priced in euros, so the cheapest plan is not the fullest one. Cituna is $39/mo flat for all seven engines with no engine held back for a higher tier.

Does AthenaHQ or Omnia cover more AI engines?

AthenaHQ, on published entry-tier counts: 5 free / 11 paid against 7 for Omnia. Engine counts are the most misread number in this category, so check what the entry tier actually includes rather than the total the site advertises, AthenaHQ’s entry tier free Essential tier stepping up to a $295/mo Starter. Cituna publishes one number for this: seven engines, all of them on the $39 tier, all checked daily.

Do AthenaHQ and Omnia track Claude and Grok?

AthenaHQ tracks Claude (paid ($295)) and tracks Grok (paid ($295)) (as of October 1, 2026). Omnia tracks Claude (on request) and does not track Grok (as of October 1, 2026). Both engines are included in Cituna’s $39 Starter and checked daily, which is the gap this comparison most often turns on, Grok in particular is a blind spot across much of this category.

Try Cituna on your own buyer questions

Compare brand mentions, cited sources and competitors across seven AI engines. Turn the gaps you find into prioritized SEO, AEO and GEO fixes.

Start free trial

3-day free trial · Card required, cancel anytime · Plans from $39 a month

Check crawler readiness free