If Omnia has you paying €279 to unlock data export, or you have hit its no-Grok, no-Search-Console ceilings, you are shopping for more in the base plan. Cituna tracks all seven engines daily (Grok and Google AI Overviews included) and pairs them with a native Search Console loop from $39. Omnia is an approachable, well-built tool for small teams (seven engines, with Claude and Copilot on request, sentiment analysis from its €79 tier, a genuine no-card trial), and below we weigh it honestly against the alternatives on engine coverage at your price, Search Console proof, and what you actually pay. Competitor facts were compiled from public pricing pages on July 16, 2026, with Omnia’s and Peec AI’s re-read on October 1, 2026.
A note on fairness:
Why people look for Omnia alternatives
Omnia is a capable tool, and none of the reasons below make it a bad one, they are simply where its published plans stop matching what a growing team needs. Teams evaluating Omnia and then shopping around usually cite a consistent set of triggers (all from useomnia.com/pricing, as of July 16, 2026):
- Data export is paywalled at €279. Data export, something many rivals include lower down, only unlocks on the €279/mo Pro tier, so you pay a big step up for what is often treated as table stakes. Sentiment analysis, by contrast, is on Omnia’s €79 Growth tier as of October 1, 2026; we do not offer it at any tier, so that one is a genuine Omnia capability, not a gap.
- The entry tier is metered. Growth covers 25 prompts and 150 “insight credits” at €79/mo, so an active prompt set and heavier analysis run into caps quickly.
- There is no Grok at any tier. Omnia does not track Grok on any plan, so if your buyers ask Grok, you cannot monitor it there.
If one or more of those is the reason you are here, the table below compares Omnia against three alternatives on exactly those points.
The side-by-side matrix
Everything below reflects each vendor’s entry paid tier as published on their own pricing page on July 16, 2026 (Omnia and Peec AI: October 1, 2026), not the maximum an enterprise contract can unlock.
| What you get | CitunaThat’s us | Omnia | Peec AI | Otterly.ai |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry price / month | $39 | €79* | $95* | $29 |
| AI engines included | 7 | 7* | — | 4 |
| Claude tracked | On request | Enterprise | Add-on | |
| Grok tracked | — | |||
| Microsoft Copilot | On request | — | ||
| Google AI Overviews | — | — | ||
| Search Console integration | — | — | ||
| MCP access at entry | — | — | ||
| Sentiment analysis | — | — | ||
| Generated fixes | Weekly plans | — | — | |
| Free trial | 3 days (card) | 14 days | Yes, length not stated | — |
Compiled from each vendor’s public pricing page on July 16, 2026, with Omnia and Peec AI re-read October 1, 2026 (Omnia figures from useomnia.com/pricing; Peec and Otterly.ai links in the detail sections below). Prices change often, verify before buying. ‘*’ = varies by tier, region or add-on: Omnia’s seven engines (four by default, with Claude, Gemini and Microsoft Copilot on request) and €79 price are its Growth entry tier, with Pro at €279 (which adds data export) and Enterprise from €499+. Peec’s Starter is $95/mo, or $80/mo billed annually. Omnia’s 14-day trial needs no card. Notes: all seven Cituna engines are checked daily; MCP read tools are included from $39, write tools from Pro ($119). A dash in a cell means the figure is not specified in our source data for that tool. Spot an error? Tell us and we will correct it. Peec AI’s pricing page, read October 9, 2026, offers a free trial without stating its length or whether a card is needed.
Read the matrix by the row that matters most to you. Cituna includes Grok and Google AI Overviews, connects Search Console and generates the fixes on every plan at $39. Omnia is the pick if you specifically want its Microsoft Copilot coverage, its sentiment analysis, or its no-card on-ramp.
What Omnia does well
Give Omnia its due, because it should shape your decision. Omnia is built for small marketing teams, the pitch is literally “you do 5%, Omnia does 95%”, and it starts you off with a free 40-prompt AI-visibility checker that emails you a report, so you can see where you stand before paying anything. Omnia’s Growth tier at €79/mo tracks four engines by default, with Claude, Gemini and Microsoft Copilot available on request (as of October 1, 2026), so Copilot coverage is within reach at entry, one of its real strengths. Omnia also offers an MCP integration and a 14-day trial with no card required. The trade-offs on Omnia are the ones above: data export waits behind the €279/mo Pro tier (Enterprise is €499+), Grok is not tracked on any plan, and the entry tier is metered at 25 prompts and 150 insight credits (as of July 16, 2026). A fair pick for a small team that wants Copilot coverage, a gentle on-ramp and a no-card trial, and the right pick over us if you need sentiment analysis, which we do not offer, or do not need Grok and Search Console.
The alternatives in detail
How this list works: every entry tracks how AI engines mention and cite a brand. Cituna comes first: it is our product, and it tracks all seven engines daily, writes the fixes and publishes articles from $39/mo. After that the numbers help you find your way; they are not a ranking.
1. Cituna (best for seven engines, Search Console and generated fixes at $39)
Where Omnia leads with hand-holding for small teams, Cituna leads with coverage and the fix: it scans how ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Grok, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode cite your brand, all seven checked daily, stores the full answer each engine gave, shows the exact buyer prompts where you are missing, and generates the fix for each gap (schema, FAQ markup, llms.txt and the page changes). Cituna’s AutoSEO writes 30 articles a month on Starter and publishes them to WordPress, Shopify, a GitHub repo or any CMS by webhook. All seven engines are in the $39/mo Starter; Pro ($119) adds write-enabled MCP and backlink, keyword and SERP-rank data, and Max ($399) serves agencies and high-volume sites with 90 tracked prompts, 10 brands, daily scans on every brand, API access and priority support, with custom Enterprise plans (tailored prompt pools, brands and engine cadences, invoiced billing, priority onboarding) when you scale further. A native Google Search Console integration ties the work back to real clicks, and a built-in MCP server is included from $39 so you can query your scans from Claude or any MCP client, read tools on Starter, write actions like running a scan on Pro. MCP is not unique to us (Omnia ships one too); what is rarer is pairing it with Search Console at this price. One honest gap: we do not track Microsoft Copilot, which Omnia offers on request. Our 3-day free trial asks for a card up front, no charge during it, cancel anytime, and we run Cituna on our own site daily, the same seven-engine scan and generated fixes you get.
2. Peec AI (best for EU marketing-team analytics)
An EU peer built for marketing teams, Peec is analytics-first, and its depth on analytics is where it is strongest. Peec’s entry plan is $95/mo, or $80/mo billed annually (as of October 1, 2026). The catch for engine coverage: Peec lists Claude only on its custom Enterprise plan, so if that is an engine your buyers use, confirm it before switching. A clean choice if polished analytics matter to you more than a fix generator, and we line it up against the field in our Peec AI alternatives rundown.
3. Otterly.ai (best when Microsoft Copilot matters more than Claude)
Otterly.ai’s entry tier is $29/mo (as of July 16, 2026) for 15 prompts on four engines: Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity and Microsoft Copilot. Claude comes as a paid add-on rather than being included and Grok is not offered, so factor that in if you need them; for a solo marketer who tracks a small prompt set and cares about Copilot, Otterly.ai is a fair place to start. We compare it against the wider field in our Otterly.ai alternatives rundown.
The category runs wider than the tools above, from enterprise platforms at the top end to free single-shot checkers at the bottom, and we price out the full field, side by side, in our best AI visibility tools rundown.
How to switch from Omnia
Moving your monitoring across is a short job, because the inputs are the same prompts and competitors you already track:
- Export your prompts and competitors from Omnia. Copy the buyer questions you monitor and the competitor list you benchmark against, that set is the only thing you truly need to carry over.
- Recreate them in Cituna. Add your domain, paste the same prompts and competitors, and let it map them across all seven engines, including Grok, which Omnia does not track.
- Run your first scan. Your first run establishes a baseline across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Grok, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode, and surfaces the prompts where you are missing plus the generated fixes to close them.
- Connect Google Search Console. Link GSC so the tool can tie AI citations back to real clicks and impressions, the proof step Omnia cannot do, and, if you want the scans and fix statuses in your own workflow, connect the MCP server.
The fastest way to compare is to point both tools at the same prompts and domain during a trial and see which one shows you the gaps, and the fixes, you care about. For the wider field, see our rundown of the best AI visibility tools.
Drafted with AI assistance from our own research and Search Console data, and reviewed by Rahul A before publishing. Rules and prices change; check the linked official source before you act.