Perplexity does not draw evenly from the web. It skews toward community and discussion sources: published analyses put Reddit at roughly 46.7% of its top citations. Perplexity retrieves live for almost every query and shows its sources inline as numbered citations. For your own category rather than the published average, Cituna checks daily which of Perplexity’s numbered sources point at you and which point at Reddit threads or a rival.
How Perplexity actually decides
Because it shows its sources, Perplexity is the most transparent of the six to audit: you can read exactly which URLs it used, which is why it is usually the first engine worth working on.
In practice that means the surfaces worth auditing first are Reddit, forum threads and community Q&A, recent blog posts, documentation.
The method, in order
Start from the skew, not from your site. Perplexity’s citations concentrate in Reddit, forum threads and community Q&A, recent blog posts, documentation.
Separate the sources it cites from the sources it trusts silently. This engine shows its sources, so the list is observable directly.
Read the citations prompt by prompt, not as one total. A source that appears on your buying questions matters more than one that appears on definitions, and a single count hides the difference.
Check your category specifically. Citation skew is a population-level finding; the sources for legal advice and for developer tooling are not the same, and only your own prompt set tells you which applies.
Audit whether you appear on the top sources at all, then rank the gaps by how hard each is to close: a subreddit comment and a Wikipedia citation are not the same amount of work.
Re-measure after each placement lands. Perplexity’s volatility is high, it retrieves live, so answers can change within a day of a new page appearing.
The honest caveat
A brand with no presence in community discussion is very hard to surface here, however good its own site is. This is the engine where owned content alone reliably fails.
Cituna checks Perplexity daily alongside Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Google AI Mode and Grok, on the $39 Starter, and pairs the result with Google Search Console so a change here can be tied to real clicks. Then it does the work: it generates the fix for each gap, its AutoSEO writes and publishes the articles that answer the questions you are missing, and Claude or any other AI agent can work through the results over MCP.
Drafted with AI assistance from our own research and Search Console data, and reviewed by Rahul A before publishing. Rules and prices change; check the linked official source before you act.